<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>All That I Know Comments</title>
	<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com</link>
	<description>What I have learnt about IT</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2007/01/26/voip-the-internet-telephone-era/#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2007/01/26/voip-the-internet-telephone-era/#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Great to see someone actually read my blog... hehehe

You know 8 months ago I badly wanted to have a Treo myself. I remember getting hooked onto Palm OS after seeing Dr. Ramani with is Palm III at the Mech Eng. Department at Purdue. Then I bought one of my own and then later moved to a Palm V and then to Palm Zire. I could not afford a Treo though. I still have CDs full of Palm OS software. But the Palm guys gave up on Palm OS and now they are shifting to Access Linux instead (I am sure you know that).

So the short answer is that the new version of Treo will indefinitely have a SIP based VoIP program available, but as far as your current Treo is concerned, its already obsolete .. haa haa haa...

But then I guess you could be using the Windows Mobile version of Treo in which case .... huh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Great to see someone actually read my blog&#8230; hehehe</p>
	<p>You know 8 months ago I badly wanted to have a Treo myself. I remember getting hooked onto Palm OS after seeing Dr. Ramani with is Palm III at the Mech Eng. Department at Purdue. Then I bought one of my own and then later moved to a Palm V and then to Palm Zire. I could not afford a Treo though. I still have CDs full of Palm OS software. But the Palm guys gave up on Palm OS and now they are shifting to Access Linux instead (I am sure you know that).</p>
	<p>So the short answer is that the new version of Treo will indefinitely have a SIP based VoIP program available, but as far as your current Treo is concerned, its already obsolete .. haa haa haa&#8230;</p>
	<p>But then I guess you could be using the Windows Mobile version of Treo in which case &#8230;. huh&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Atif Mahmood</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2007/01/26/voip-the-internet-telephone-era/#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2007/01/26/voip-the-internet-telephone-era/#comment-22</guid>
					<description>Yes but will this work on my Treo :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes but will this work on my Treo <img src='http://pathan.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Atif Mahmood</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/10/16/vb6-may-live-if/#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/10/16/vb6-may-live-if/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>The problem with VB is really that the software developed with it isn't very scalable.  You can get something quickly thrown together, but it was only really good as a small front end to a database or a small application.

A Object oriented - type safe language like Java, C++, C#, or VB.NET is far more scalable, and can leverage modern software design concepts and design patterns etc.  Additionally .NET allows you to avoid DLL hell, and easily interop with code written in any other language (that compiles to the CLR).  Though, in practice, c++ code is still annoying to interop with.  Specially if the c++ code isn't being sunsetted, but extended.

VB had a place, but its dead.  For people to really keep[ up with the latest and greatest, they shoudl forget VB and move to C#.  Its really not much more complicated, and the gui designer will help you get small applications together pretty fast.  Additionally you have the ability to leverage the entire .NET library and prevent your application from being limited by the language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The problem with VB is really that the software developed with it isn&#8217;t very scalable.  You can get something quickly thrown together, but it was only really good as a small front end to a database or a small application.</p>
	<p>A Object oriented - type safe language like Java, C++, C#, or VB.NET is far more scalable, and can leverage modern software design concepts and design patterns etc.  Additionally .NET allows you to avoid DLL hell, and easily interop with code written in any other language (that compiles to the CLR).  Though, in practice, c++ code is still annoying to interop with.  Specially if the c++ code isn&#8217;t being sunsetted, but extended.</p>
	<p>VB had a place, but its dead.  For people to really keep[ up with the latest and greatest, they shoudl forget VB and move to C#.  Its really not much more complicated, and the gui designer will help you get small applications together pretty fast.  Additionally you have the ability to leverage the entire .NET library and prevent your application from being limited by the language.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jigga Killa</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2006/11/14/my-new-favourite-desktop/#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2006/11/14/my-new-favourite-desktop/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>yo you are such a nerd jigga </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yo you are such a nerd jigga
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: testanchor395</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/26/open-source-java-app-servers/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 04:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/26/open-source-java-app-servers/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>testcomment389</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>testcomment389
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: party poker</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/10/full-linux-os-without-installation/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/10/full-linux-os-without-installation/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>party poker  &lt;a href rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>party poker  <a href rel="nofollow"></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SAOIRSE  :: Full Linux OS without Installation11</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/10/full-linux-os-without-installation/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/10/full-linux-os-without-installation/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>0/January/2005   Full Linux OS without Installation1  Filed under: cuimhneachán          	All That I Know :: Full Linux OS without Installation1 	Check out the a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>0/January/2005   Full Linux OS without Installation1  Filed under: cuimhneachán          	All That I Know :: Full Linux OS without Installation1 	Check out the a [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: micheailin</title>
		<link>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/10/full-linux-os-without-installation/#comment-2</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pathan.blogsome.com/2005/01/10/full-linux-os-without-installation/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>Wow! You have really given me some good ideas! Thanks for the heads up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow! You have really given me some good ideas! Thanks for the heads up!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
